Analysis of speeds in the 400-meter hurdles and gender differences A study from the Paris 2024 Olympics
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background/objectives. This study aims to analyse the speed differences between men and women in the 400 meters during the Paris 2024 Olympic Games. Average speeds in each segment of the race were evaluated, highlighting gender variations and performance across the different rounds of the competition. Methods. A descriptive observational study was conducted using data from 208 athletes (50% women). Average speeds per 50-meter segments were analysed across all rounds (heats, semifinals, and final), applying Student's t-tests to compare results between genders. The significance level was set at p < .05. Results. The average speeds showed significant differences between sexes in all segments of the race (p < .05). The largest difference was observed in the first 150 meters, where men outpaced women by a margin of 0.97 km/h. By 250 meters, the difference decreased to 0.43 km/h. In the final rounds, the winners reached maximum speeds of 36.87 km/h (men) and 32.48 km/h (women). Conclusion. Men exhibit a biomechanical advantage in the race's early stages, while both sexes strategically adjust their pacing in the final rounds. These findings suggest that gender differences in performance are linked to both physiological and biomechanical factors.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Each author warrants that his or her submission to the Work is original and that he or she has full power to enter into this agreement. Neither this Work nor a similar work has been published elsewhere in any language nor shall be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by Journal of Human Sport and Exercise (JHSE). Each author also accepts that the JHSE will not be held legally responsible for any claims of compensation.
Authors wishing to include figures or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright holder(s) and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
Please include at the end of the acknowledgements a declaration that the experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the abovementioned requirements. The author(s) will be held responsible for false statements or failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements.
This title is licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
- You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
- No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
How to Cite
References
Atkinson, M., James, J., Quinn, M., Senefeld, J., & Hunter, S. (2024). Sex differences in track and field elite youth. https://doi.org/10.51224/SRXIV.324
Cicchella, A. (2022). The Problem of Effort Distribution in Heavy Glycolytic Trials with Special Reference to the 400 m Dash in Track and Field. Biology, 11(2), 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11020216
Dal Pupo, J., Arins, F. B., Antonacci Guglielmo, L. G., Rosendo da Silva, R. C., Moro, A. R. P., & Dos Santos, S. G. (2013). Physiological and neuromuscular indices associated with sprint running performance. Research in sports medicine, 21(2), 124-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/15438627.2012.757225
Duffield, R., Dawson, B., & Goodman, C. (2005). Energy system contribution to 400-metre and 800-metre track running. Journal of sports sciences, 23(3), 299-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410410001730043
Gajer, B., Hanon, C., & Thepaut-Mathieu, C. (2007). Velocity and stride parameters in the 400 metres. New Studies in Athletics, 22(3), 39-46.
Guex, K. (2012). Kinematic analysis of the women's 400 m hurdles. New Studies in Athletics, 27(1/2), 41-51.
Hanon, C., & Gajer, B. (2009). Velocity and stride parameters of world-class 400-meter athletes compared with less experienced runners. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 23(2), 524-531. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e318194e071
Helgerud, J., Hov, H., Mehus, H., Balto, B., Boye, A., Finsås, L., Hoff, J., & Wang, E. (2023). Aerobic high‐intensity intervals improve V̇O2max more than supramaximal sprint intervals in females, similar to males. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 33(11), 2193-2207. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.14470
Iskra, J., Gupta, S., Przednowek, K., V Best, R., & Stanula, A. (2024). The impact of physique on strategy and performance in the 400 m hurdles race among elite male athletes. Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity, 16(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.29359/BJHPA.16.1.04
Iwańska, D., Tabor, P., Grabowska, O., & Mastalerz, A. (2021). The symmetry of fatigue of lower limb muscles in 400 m run based on electromyoFigurey signals. Symmetry, 13(9), 1698. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13091698
Jeffreys, I. (2024). Developing speed. Human Kinetics.
Kalih, B. S., & Rahmadani, E. A. (2021). Comparison of 800 Meter and 400 Meter Run Effects on The Increase Of Lactic Acid In Athletic Athlete. Gladi: Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 12(03), 61-67. https://doi.org/10.21009/GJIK.123.09
Le Hyaric, A., Aftalion, A., & Hanley, B. (2024). Modelling the optimization of world-class 400 m and 1,500 m running performances using high-resolution data. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 6, 1293145. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1293145
McClelland, E. L., & Weyand, P. G. (2022). Sex differences in human running performance: smaller gaps at shorter distances? Journal of Applied Physiology, 133(4), 876-885. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00359.2022
Miller, J. (2023). Anaerobic Capacity. In Laboratory Manual for Strength and Conditioning (pp. 133-147). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003186762-9
Olympics. (2024). Paris 2024 Olympic Sports. Olympics.com. Retrieved from [Accessed 2025, January 22]: https://olympics.com/es/paris-2024/calendario/11-agosto
Paul, D. J., Gabbett, T. J., & Nassis, G. P. (2016). Agility in team sports: Testing, training and factors affecting performance. Sports medicine, 46, 421-442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0428-2
Santisteban, K. J., Lovering, A. T., Halliwill, J. R., & Minson, C. T. (2022). Sex differences in VO2max and the impact on endurance-exercise performance. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(9), 4946. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19094946
Tiller, N. B., Elliott-Sale, K. J., Knechtle, B., Wilson, P. B., Roberts, J. D., & Millet, G. Y. (2021). Do sex differences in physiology confer a female advantage in ultra-endurance sport? Sports medicine, 51(5), 895-915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01417-2
World Medical Association (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191-2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
Zhang, J., Lin, X.-Y., & Zhang, S. (2021). Correlation analysis of sprint performance and reaction time based on double logarithm model. Complexity, 2021(1), 6633326. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6633326