Comparison between mobile fitness apps users and gender on exercise intensity in university students
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
University students are an exclusive subcategory because most of them are young adults at a transformation period, training to stay independently while concurrently working toward completion of their professional degrees. Previous research reported that only 30% to 50% of university students meet the recommended proportion of exercise for health advantage. Mobile fitness apps are invented on purpose to support exercise. Many health advantages like preventing cardiovascular diseases and diabetes, it will marshal exercise and as mobile motivational tools because motivation is a major barrier to exercise. The present study was designed to investigate and compare the exercise intensity between the mobile fitness app users and none-users. The secondary purpose was to examine and compare the exercise intensity between gender from the university students. A total three hundred fifty-five university students were recruited in the study. The International Physical Activity Questionnaires- Short Form (IPAQ-SF) was used to collect exercise intensity of the participants in current study. All participants have been briefed on the objectives of this study and agreed to answer the International Physical Activity Questionnaires (IPAQ) and signed an informed consent form. The independent t-tests to determine the differences of the exercise intensity between mobile fitness app users and nonmobile fitness users. Independent t-tests also to find-out differences exercise intensity between gender in the university students, the statistical significance was set at p < .05. There were significant differences of exercise intensity level between nonmobile fitness apps users and mobile fitness apps users [ t (352) = 2.82, p = .005, d = 0.28]. It means the nonmobile fitness apps users had a significant higher exercise intensity if compared to the mobile fitness apps users. There were significant differences of exercise intensity level between male and female university students [ t (352) = 4.54, p = .001, d = 0.48]. Current results are similar to many studies found that female students participated in less exercise than their male counterparts.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Each author warrants that his or her submission to the Work is original and that he or she has full power to enter into this agreement. Neither this Work nor a similar work has been published elsewhere in any language nor shall be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by Journal of Human Sport and Exercise (JHSE). Each author also accepts that the JHSE will not be held legally responsible for any claims of compensation.
Authors wishing to include figures or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright holder(s) and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
Please include at the end of the acknowledgements a declaration that the experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the abovementioned requirements. The author(s) will be held responsible for false statements or failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements.
This title is licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
- You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
- No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
How to Cite
References
Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Keer, H., Van den Berghe, L., De Meyer, J., & Haerens, L. (2012). Students' Objectively Measured Physical Activity Levels and Engagement as a Function of Between-Class and Between-Student Differences in Motivation Toward Physical Education. Journal of sport & exercise psychology, 34, 457-480. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.34.4.457
Austin-McCain, M. (2017). An Examination of the Association of Social Media Use with the Satisfaction with Daily Routines and Healthy Lifestyle Habits for Undergraduate and Graduate Students. The Open Journal of Occupational Therapy, 5. https://doi.org/10.15453/2168-6408.1327
Bice, M., Ball, J., & McClaran, S. (2015). Technology and physical activity motivation. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 14, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2015.1025811
Chaskar, P., Loh, S. Y., & Babs, S. (2017). Reliability and validity of international physical activity questionnaire, Bahasa Malaysia version: a preliminary study. South African Journal for Research in Sport, Physical Education and Recreation, 39, 31-40.
Chomitz, V., Slining, M., McGowan, R., Mitchell, S., Dawson, G., & Hacker, K. (2009). Chomitz VR, Slining MM, McGowan RJ, Mitchell SE, Dawson GF, Hacker KA. Is there a relationship between physical fitness and academic achievement? Positive results from public school children in the Northeastern United States. J School Health 79, 30-36. The Journal of school health, 79, 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00371.x
Chu, K.-H., Tung, H.-H., Clinciu, D., Hsu, H.-I., Wu, Y.-C., Hsu, C.-I., . . . Pan, S.-J. (2022). A Preliminary Study on Self-Healing and Self-Health Management in Older Adults: Perspectives From Healthcare Professionals and Older Adults in Taiwan. Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, 8, 233372142210777. https://doi.org/10.1177/23337214221077788
Corder, K., Ekelund, U., Steele, R., Wareham, N., & Brage, S. (2008). Assessment of physical activity in youth. Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 105, 977-987. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00094.2008
Craft, B. B., Carroll, H. A., & Lustyk, M. K. (2014). Gender Differences in Exercise Habits and Quality of Life Reports: Assessing the Moderating Effects of Reasons for Exercise. Int J Lib Arts Soc Sci, 2(5), 65-76.
DeBate, R. D., Pettee Gabriel, K., Zwald, M., Huberty, J., & Zhang, Y. (2009). Changes in psychosocial factors and physical activity frequency among third- to eighth-grade girls who participated in a developmentally focused youth sport program: a preliminary study. J Sch Health, 79(10), 474-484. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00437.x
Dumitru, D., Dumitru Dumitru, T., & Maher, A. (2018). A systematic review of exercise addiction: Examining gender differences. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2018.03253
Elliott, J., Munford, L., Ahmed, S., Littlewood, A., & Todd, C. (2022). The impact of COVID-19 lockdowns on physical activity amongst older adults: evidence from longitudinal data in the UK. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 1802. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14156-y
Elliott, L. D., Tran, B., Dzieniszewski, E., Duffey, M., Wilson, O. W. A., & Bopp, M. (2022). Differences in United States college student physical activity and exercise self-efficacy based on gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of American College Health, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2022.2093117
Etnier, J. L., Salazar, W., Landers, D. M., Petruzzello, S. J., Han, M., & Nowell, P. (1997). The Influence of Physical Fitness and Exercise upon Cognitive Functioning: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 19(3), 249-277. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.19.3.249
Flook, L., Repetti, R., & Ullman, J. (2005). Classroom Social Experiences as Predictors of Academic Performance. Developmental Psychology, 41, 319-327. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.2.319
Glowacki, K., Duncan, M., Gainforth, H., & Faulkner, G. (2017). Barriers and facilitators to physical activity and exercise among adults with depression: A scoping review. Mental Health and Physical Activity, 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhpa.2017.10.001
Goyal, S., & Cafazzo, J. (2013). Mobile Phone Health Apps for Diabetes Management: Current Evidence and Future Developments. QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians, 106. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hct203
Gui, M., Fasoli, M., & Carradore, R. (2017). "Digital Well-Being". Developing a New Theoretical Tool For Media Literacy Research. 9.
Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586
Huang, G., & Ren, Y. (2019). Linking Technological Functions of Fitness Mobile Apps with Continuance Usage among Chinese Users: Moderating Role of Exercise Self-Efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.013
Jenkins, J., Jenkins, P., Collums, A., & Werhonig, G. (2006). Student perceptions of a conceptual physical education activity course. Physical Educator, 63, 210-221.
Jiang, S., Zhang, L., & Teo, K. (2021). Social Use of Fitness Apps and Physical Activity Knowledge: The Roles of Information Elaboration and Interpersonal Communication. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 65, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2021.1990295
Keating, X., Guan, J., Castro-Piñero, J., & Bridges, D. (2005). A Meta-Analysis of College Students' Physical Activity Behaviors. Journal of American college health : J of ACH, 54, 116-125. https://doi.org/10.3200/JACH.54.2.116-126
Kim, H.-Y., Frongillo, E., Han, S.-S., Oh, S.-Y., Kim, W.-K., Jang, Y.-A., . . . Kim, S.-H. (2003). Academic performance of Korean children is associated with dietary behaviours and physical status. Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition, 12, 186-192.
Kranz, M., Möller, A., Hammerla, N., Diewald, S., Roalter, L., Ploetz, T., & Olivier, P. (2012). The mobile fitness coach: Towards individualized skill assessment using personalized mobile devices. Pervasive and Mobile Computing (PMC), 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2012.06.002
Lagally, K., & Robertson, R. (2006). Construct Validity of the OMNI Resistance Exercise Scale. Journal of strength and conditioning research / National Strength & Conditioning Association, 20, 252-256. https://doi.org/10.1519/R-17224.1
Lipscomb, S. (2009). Students with Disabilities and California's Special Education Program.
Lu, H.-H., Lin, W.-S., Raphael, C., & Wen, M.-J. (2023). A study investigating user adoptive behavior and the continuance intention to use mobile health applications during the COVID-19 pandemic era: Evidence from the telemedicine applications utilized in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Management Review, 28(1), 52-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2022.02.002
McArthur, L., & Raedeke, T. (2009). Race and Sex Differences in College Student Physical Activity Correlates. American journal of health behavior, 33, 80-90. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.33.1.8
Mulgrew, K., & Tiggemann, M. (2016). Form or function: Does focusing on body functionality protect women from body dissatisfaction when viewing media images? Journal of Health Psychology, 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316655471
Racette, S., Deusinger, S., Strube, M., Highstein, G., & Deusinger, R. (2010). Weight Changes, Exercise, and Dietary Patterns During Freshman and Sophomore Years of College. Journal of American college health : J of ACH, 53, 245-251. https://doi.org/10.3200/JACH.53.6.245-251
Reiner, M., Niermann, C., Jekauc, D., & Woll, A. (2013). Long-term health benefits of physical activity--a systematic review of longitudinal studies. BMC Public Health, 13, 813. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-813
Stiglbauer, B., Weber, S., & Batinic, B. (2019). Does your health really benefit from using a self-tracking device? Evidence from a longitudinal randomized control trial. Computers in Human Behavior, 94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.018
Thompson, W. R. (2023). Worldwide Survey of Fitness Trends for 2023. ACSM's Health & Fitness Journal, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1249/FIT.0000000000000834
Utesch, T., Piesch, L., Busch, L., Strauss, B., & Geukes, K. (2022). Self-tracking of daily physical activity using a fitness tracker and the effect of the 10,000 steps goal. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research, 52(2), 300-309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-022-00821-2
Wang, Y., & Collins, W. (2020). Systematic Evaluation of Mobile Fitness Apps: Apps as the Tutor, Recorder, Game Companion, and Cheerleader. Telematics and Informatics, 59, 101552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101552
Wilson, O. W. A., Papalia, Z., Duffey, M., & Bopp, M. (2019). Differences in college students' aerobic physical activity and muscle-strengthening activities based on gender, race, and sexual orientation. Preventive Medicine Reports, 16, 100984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100984
Wu, Y., Mai, Y., & Huang, Y. (2021). What Type of Social Support Is Important for Student Resilience During COVID-19? A Latent Profile Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 646145. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.646145
Zarei, M., Mohd Taib, M. N., Zarei, F., & Abu Saad, H. (2013). Factors associated with body weight status of Iranian postgraduate students in university of putra malaysia. Nurs Midwifery Stud, 2(4), 97-102. https://doi.org/10.5812/nms.9186